Comments Here you can comment about my website and I can use the feedback to further improve my website
Peer Review (Done After Live Review) - Pranav Santosh
| Category | Points | Description | Peer Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Five tasks over 12 weeks | 5 | List five things completed, including issues addressed, burndown tracking, and presentation work. | 4.5 |
| Full Stack Project Demo | 2 | Demonstrate the project, highlight CPT requirements, and incorporate N@tM feedback. | 1.9 |
| Project Feature Blog Write-up | 1 | Use CPT/FRQ language to write a structured blog post on project features. | 0.9 |
| MCQ Completion | 1 | Successfully complete and reflect on multiple-choice questions. | 1 |
| Retrospective Reflection | 1 | - Reflect on strengths and weaknesses - Create next steps plans for improvement - Engage with peer projects and document interests - Think about future steps in CompSci, classes, college, internships, or career - Help a new peer with final exam prep or conduct a live review with Ms. Pataki - Send a detailed summary of review points 24 hours in advance, including a self-grade assessment |
0.9 |
| Total | 10 | Maximum possible score. | 9.2 |
Feedback:
- Make sure you have the feedback that you got from your N@TM presentation. This should be implemented.
- Go more in depth on your weaknesses and strengths.
- make sure you have coded cells formated properly using the ‘```’.
Improvements
- Added imporvements based on N@TM presentation such as fixing UI for update and changing AWS blog to Help.
- Added more about my weaknesses and strengths in both my feature blog and Future reflection blog.
- Incorperated code cells into project feature blog for a more clean and readable blog.